Cuba
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices  - 2005
Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
March 8, 2006
Cuba, with a population of 11 million, is a totalitarian state led by a 
president, Fidel Castro, whose regime controls all aspects of life 
through the Communist Party (CP) and its affiliated mass organizations, 
the government bureaucracy, and the state security apparatus. Although 
civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the 
security forces, the Ministry of Interior is the principal instrument of 
state security and control, and officers of the Revolutionary Armed 
Forces, which are led by the president's brother, have occupied most key 
positions in the ministry during the past 15 years.
The government's human rights record remained poor, and the government 
continued to commit numerous, serious abuses. At least 333 Cuban 
political prisoners and detainees were held at year's end. The following 
human rights problems were reported:
     * denial of citizens' rights to change their government
     * beatings and abuse of detainees and prisoners, including human 
rights activists, carried out with impunity
     * transfers of mentally healthy prisoners to psychiatric facilities 
for political reasons
     * frequent harassment of political opponents by 
government-recruited mobs
     * extremely harsh and life-threatening prison conditions, including 
denial of medical care
     * arbitrary arrest and detention of human rights advocates and 
members of independent professional organizations
     * denial of fair trial, particularly to political prisoners
     * interference with privacy, including pervasive monitoring of 
private communications
     * severe limitations on freedom of speech and press
     * denial of peaceful assembly and association
     * restrictions on freedom of movement, including selective denial 
of exit permits to thousands of citizens
     * refusal to recognize domestic human rights groups or to permit 
them to function legally
     * domestic violence, underage prostitution, and sex tourism
     * discrimination against persons of African descent
     * severe restrictions on worker rights, including the right to form 
independent unions
RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom From:
a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life
There were no reports that the government or its agents committed 
arbitrary or unlawful killings. However, the Cuba Archive human rights 
project noted in November that foul play was likely in many prison 
deaths recorded as "heart attacks."
b. Disppearance
There were no reports of politically motivated disappearances.
c. Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
The law prohibits abusive treatment of detainees and prisoners; however, 
members of the security forces sometimes beat and otherwise abused human 
rights advocates, detainees, and prisoners, particularly political 
prisoners, and did so with impunity.
Authorities often subjected detainees and prisoners to repeated, 
vigorous interrogations designed to coerce them into signing 
incriminating statements or to force their collaboration with 
authorities. Some endured physical and sexual abuse, typically by other 
inmates with the acquiescence of guards, or long periods in isolation or 
punishment cells.
On February 19, a "reeducation specialist" forced political prisoner 
Fidel Garcia Roldan into a cell, pushed him against the wall, then hit 
him repeatedly in the head.
On March 2, Juan Carlos Herrera Acosta, a prisoner at Kilo 8 prison in 
Camaguey, was handcuffed and dragged more than 120 feet across the floor 
of the prison; he suffered severe cuts and abrasions. As of that date, 
Herrera Acosta had not been exposed to sunlight for more than one year.
Throughout March and April, authorities subjected political prisoner 
Jose Daniel Ferrer Garcia to deafeningly loud music and noise from a 
speaker placed by the guards at the entrance to his cell from the early 
morning until late each night; as of April 28, he had been denied 
exposure to sunlight for seven months.
In August a prison guard beat dissident Arnaldo Ramos Lauzurique. On 
September 26, a guard at Camaguey's Kilo 8 prison punched and broke the 
nose of political prisoner Lamberto Hernandez Plana, following his 
refusal to stand for a lineup of inmates. The government knowingly sent 
mentally healthy prisoners to psychiatric hospitals or the psychiatric 
ward of a prison hospital. For most of the year, Dr. Luis Milan 
Fernandez, a political prisoner with no known mental ailment, was held 
at the psychiatric ward of the Boniato prison in Santiago. Dr. Milan was 
forced to share a cell with prisoners suffering from severe mental 
illness. In February the government regained custody of academic Orlando 
Vallin Diaz, who had escaped from a psychiatric hospital months earlier. 
Vallin had been sent to the hospital after serving approximately three 
months in prison for alleged drug trafficking; family members denied 
that Vallin had ever been involved with drugs or shown any sign of 
mental illness.
The government continued to subject persons who disagreed with it to 
"acts of repudiation." At government instigation members of 
state-controlled mass organizations, fellow workers, or neighbors of 
victims staged public protests against those who dissented from the 
government's policies by shouting obscenities and causing damage to the 
homes and property of those targeted. Physical attacks on victims or 
their family members sometimes occurred. Police and State Security 
agents often were present but took no action to prevent or end the 
attacks. Those who refused to participate in these actions faced 
disciplinary action, including loss of employment.
Prison and Detention Center Conditions
Prison conditions continued to be harsh and life threatening. Conditions 
in detention facilities also were harsh. Prison authorities frequently 
beat, neglected, isolated, and denied medical treatment to detainees and 
prisoners, particularly those convicted of political crimes or those who 
persisted in expressing their views. Authorities also often denied 
family visitation, adequate nutrition, exposure to natural light, pay 
for work, and the right to petition the prison director.
Prisoners sometimes were held in "punishment cells," which usually were 
located in the basement of a prison, with continuous semi-dark 
conditions, no available water, and only a hole for a toilet. Reading 
materials, including Bibles, were not allowed. Prison officials 
regularly denied prisoners other rights, such as the right to 
correspondence. Some prison directors routinely denied religious workers 
access to detainees and prisoners.
In November the Cuban Commission for Human Rights and National 
Reconciliation denounced the worsening health of dozens of political 
prisoners, stating that more prisoners suffered from dangerous diseases 
due to the "generally subhuman and degrading conditions" in which they 
were held.
Power and water cuts were frequent at prisons, and inmates often 
suffered from extreme heat. At Havana's Combinado Del Este prison, 
disturbances were reported after allegations surfaced that prison 
authorities sold gas for personal profit.
Victor Rolando Arroyo, an independent journalist serving a 26-year 
prison term, described his cell in Guantanamo provincial prison as a 
space approximately 11 feet by 34 feet, where 34 people slept on 
three-tiered bunks. The cell was dimly lit; there were no cleaning 
supplies; and water, which flowed sporadically, had a disagreeable 
color, odor, and taste.
The government regularly failed to provide adequate nutrition and 
medical attention; according to Human Rights Watch (HRW), prisoners 
typically lose weight during incarceration. Pedro Pablo Pulido Ortega 
stated that he and other prisoners at Guamajal prison in Santa Clara 
received only cornmeal for lunch and one small portion of potatoes for 
dinner.
Prisoner of conscience Blas Giraldo Reyes Rodrigues experienced medical 
problems for two months before authorities on May 3 transferred him to 
an infirmary where tests indicated he had been suffering from an infection.
On August 2, Bertha Antunez Pernet reported that authorities at Kilo 7 
prison in Camaguey Province retaliated against her brother, Jorge Luis 
Garcia Perez, who had criticized prison conditions, by denying him 
medication for a respiratory condition.
There were occasional reports of prisoners dying as a result of violence 
by fellow prisoners, but no statistics were available. On April 4, 
Freddy Ibanez Blanco died from burns suffered in a prison uprising at 
Havana's Combinado del Este prison.
There were also occasional reports of suicide attempts by prisoners, but 
no statistics were available. In November political prisoner Mario 
Enrique Mayo twice attempted suicide.
Human rights activists alleged that prison authorities used "thugs" 
within the general prison population to harass political prisoners.
Sexual assault occurred at men's prisons, but the government did not 
disclose such incidents. In July an inmate at Aquadores prison beat and 
raped Orlando Rodriguez Salazar, who was denied medical attention except 
for a sedative.
Although officials sought to separate the juvenile and adult prisoners, 
juveniles sometimes were held in the same facilities as adults. Although 
pretrial detainees generally were held separately from convicted 
prisoners, some long-term detainees, including political detainees, were 
held with convicted prisoners.
The government did not permit independent monitoring of prison 
conditions by international or national human rights groups. The 
government has denied prison visits by the International Committee of 
the Red Cross since 1989.
d. Arbitrary Arrest or Detention
Although prohibited by law, arbitrary arrest and detention were abuses 
effectively and commonly used by the government to harass opponents.
Role of the Police and Security Apparatus
The Ministry of the Interior exercises control over police and internal 
security forces. The National Revolutionary Police (PNR) is the primary 
law enforcement organization and generally was effective in 
investigating common crimes. Specialized units of the Ministry of the 
Interior are responsible for monitoring, infiltrating, and suppressing 
opposition political groups. The PNR plays a supporting role by carrying 
out house searches and providing interrogation facilities for State 
Security agents. There were reports in both the independent and official 
press of corruption within the security forces.
Members of the security forces acted with impunity in committing 
numerous, serious human rights abuses. While the PNR ethics code and 
Interior Ministry regulations ban police brutality, the government did 
not announce any investigations into police misconduct during the year.
Arrest and Detention
The police have broad detention powers, which they may exercise without 
a warrant. Under the law, police can detain without a warrant not only 
persons caught in the act, but someone merely accused of a crime against 
state security. The law requires police to file formal charges and 
either release a detainee or bring the case before a prosecutor within 
96 hours of arrest; it also requires authorities to provide suspects 
with access to a lawyer within 7 days of arrest.
In practice the law was not respected. At least 39 political detainees 
were held at year's end without formal charges. Among them was Maximo 
Pradera Valdez, arrested in 2001 and still held without formal charge at 
year's end. On May 13, authorities in Havana detained six human rights 
activists, including Rene Montes de Oca Martija and Lazaro Alonso Roman, 
in connection with a peaceful demonstration; at year's end several of 
the activists remained in detention, and no formal charges had been 
brought. On June 22, police in Havana took into detention nine human 
rights activists, including Rene Gomez Manzano, Julio Cesar Lopez 
Rodriguez, and Jesus Alberto Reyes Sanchez, in connection with a 
peaceful demonstration; at year's end all remained in detention, and 
none had been charged.
Bail was available, although typically not in cases involving 
antigovernment activity. Time in detention before trial counted toward 
time served if convicted. The government denied prisoners and detainees 
prompt access to family members.
The law provides that all legally recognized civil liberties may be 
denied to anyone who actively opposes the decision of the people to 
build socialism. The authorities routinely invoked this authority to 
deny due process to persons detained on purported state security 
grounds. The authorities routinely engaged in arbitrary arrest and 
detention of human rights advocates. Police frequently lacked warrants 
when carrying out arrests or issued warrants themselves at the time of 
arrest. Authorities sometimes employed false charges of common crimes to 
arrest political opponents and often did not inform detainees of the 
charges against them. The authorities continued to detain human rights 
activists and independent journalists for short periods, including house 
arrest, often to prevent them from attending or participating in events 
related to human rights issues (see sections 2.a. and 2.b.).
The Penal Code includes the concept of "potential dangerousness," 
defined as the "special proclivity of a person to commit crimes, 
demonstrated by his conduct in manifest contradiction of socialist 
norms." If the police decide that a person exhibits signs of 
dangerousness, they may bring the offender before a court or subject him 
to therapy or political reeducation. Government authorities regularly 
threatened prosecution under this provision.
During the year authorities arrested at least 53 persons for democratic 
or political activity; at year's end all remained in custody, and 18 of 
them were still awaiting trial. At year's end there were at least 39 
political detainees awaiting trial, of whom 18 were detained during the 
year.
On April 27, the government convicted the remaining 23 citizens who had 
been detained since 2002 for breaking into the Mexican Embassy and 
requesting asylum. The individuals were sentenced to prison terms 
ranging from 4 to 18 years.
On July 12, the government arrested several members of the Las Marianas 
opposition group as they prepared to undertake a six-day hunger strike 
to compel the government to release non-violent dissidents from prison.
The government did not permit access to political detainees by 
international humanitarian organizations.
Authorities sometimes detained independent journalists to question them 
about contacts with foreigners or to prevent them from covering 
sensitive issues or criticizing the government (see section 2.a.). After 
months of detention, the government often released activists without 
charges.
e. Denial of Fair Public Trial
While the constitution provides for independent courts, it explicitly 
subordinates them to the National Assembly of People's Power (ANPP) and 
the Council of State. The ANPP and its lower level counterparts choose 
all judges. Thus, in practice the CP influenced the courts.
Civilian courts existed at the municipal, provincial, and appellate 
levels. Panels composed of professionally certified and lay judges 
presided over them.
Trial Procedures
The courts undermined the right to a fair trial by restricting the right 
to a defense and often failed to observe the due process rights 
nominally available to defendants. While most trials were public, trials 
were closed when there were alleged violations of state security. Almost 
all cases were tried in less than one day; there were no jury trials. 
The law provides the accused with the right to an attorney and, except 
in cases involving state security, the right to consult an attorney in a 
timely manner, but many defendants met their attorney only minutes 
before the start of their trial.
Moreover, the government's control over members of the lawyers' 
collectives compromised their ability to represent clients, especially 
those accused of state security crimes.
Criteria for presenting evidence, especially in cases involving human 
rights advocates, were arbitrary and discriminatory. Often the sole 
evidence provided, particularly in political cases, was the defendant's 
confession, usually obtained under duress and without the legal advice 
or knowledge of a defense lawyer. A defendant's right to present 
witnesses was only arbitrarily observed.
Prosecutors may introduce testimony from a member of the 
neighborhood-based Committee for the Defense of the Revolution (CDR) 
about the revolutionary background of a defendant, which may contribute 
to a longer or shorter sentence. The law presumes the innocence of the 
accused, but the authorities often ignored this right in practice. The 
law recognizes the right of appeal in municipal courts but limits it in 
provincial courts to cases involving maximum prison terms or the death 
penalty. Appeals in capital cases are automatic. The Council of State 
ultimately must affirm capital punishment.
On August 9, independent journalist Lamasiel Gutierrez was tried for 
"dangerousness" and sentenced to seven months of house arrest. During 
her trial, 25 uniformed personnel filled the courtroom. She was denied 
the right to speak on her own behalf during the proceedings, and was not 
allowed to consult with counsel.
On July 22, Rene Gomez Manzano, one of the leaders of the Assembly for 
the Promotion of Civil Society, was arrested and jailed indefinitely. 
The government refused the request of Manzano, who is an attorney by 
profession, to represent himself and insisted that he accept another 
attorney.
Military tribunals, which are governed by a special law, assumed 
jurisdiction for certain "counterrevolutionary" cases. The military 
tribunals tried civilians if a member of the military was involved with 
civilians in a crime. In these tribunals, there was a right to appeal, 
access to counsel, and the charges were made known to the defendant.
Political Prisoners
The Cuban Commission for Human Rights stated that the government held, 
in addition to political detainees, at least 294 political prisoners at 
year's end; 45 of them were convicted of terrorism and 33 of 
"dangerousness." The authorities incarcerated persons for such offenses 
as disrespect of the head of state (Fermin Scull Zulueta, three years), 
disrespect and scorn of patriotic symbols (Antonio Velazquez Hernandez, 
two years), public disorder (Orlando Zapata Tamayo, three years), and 
attempt to leave the country illegally (Osolanis San Miguel Rodriguez, 
three years). Other charges included disseminating enemy propaganda, 
illicit association, clandestine printing, or the broad charge of 
rebellion, which often was brought against advocates of peaceful 
democratic change. Between two thousand and five thousand teenagers were 
serving sentences for the crime of "potential dangerousness, with 
sentences ranging up to five years' imprisonment.
At year's end 60 of the 75 peaceful human rights activists, journalists, 
and opposition political figures arrested and convicted in 2003, mostly 
on charges of violating national security and aiding a foreign power, 
remained in prison.
Political prisoners often were held at facilities hundreds of miles from 
their families, making family visits more difficult. Prison conditions 
prompted some political prisoners to carry out lengthy hunger strikes. 
On October 5, dissidents Victor Arroyo and Felix Navarro ended their 
hunger strikes at the penal ward of a Guantanamo hospital prison after 
24 days and 18 days, respectively. They were protesting actions of a 
"re-educator" who had seriously injured Arroyo's leg. Prison staff and 
inmates (at the instigation of prison staff) often targeted political 
prisoners for abuse (see section 1.c.). Political prisoners, such as 
independent journalist Fabio Prieto Llorente and Diosdado Gonzales 
Marrero, were held among the general prison population. Conversely, 
political prisoner Adolfo Fernandez, although held with the general 
population, reported that he was prevented from interacting with other 
prisoners in the cafeteria and forced to eat all meals alone in his 
cell. Some political prisoners preferred to stay in their cells to avoid 
contact with prison guards. In November, following three hunger strikes, 
political prisoner and attorney Mario Enrique Mayo, serving a 20-year 
sentence in Holguin, carved "innocent" and "liberty" into his body. The 
government released Mayo on December 1.
The government continued to deny human rights organizations and the 
International Committee of the Red Cross access to political prisoners. 
Authorities denied visits to families of political prisoners while they 
were held in "punishment cells." Prisoners in punishment cells had no 
access to lawyers.
f. Arbitrary Interference with Privacy, Family, Home, or Correspondence
While the constitution provides for the inviolability of a citizen's 
home and correspondence, official surveillance of private and family 
affairs by government-controlled organizations, such as the CDRs, 
remained pervasive. The government employed physical and electronic 
surveillance against nonviolent political opponents. The state assumed 
the right to interfere in the lives of citizens, even those who did not 
actively oppose the government and its practices. The authorities 
employed a wide range of social controls to discover and discourage 
nonconformity.
The Ministry of Interior employed a system of informants and the CDR 
block committees to monitor and control public opinion. While less 
capable than in the past, CDRs continued to report on suspicious 
activity, including: conspicuous consumption; unauthorized meetings, 
including those with foreigners; and defiant attitudes toward the 
government and the revolution.
Between January and March, CDR members harassed Havana resident Noemi 
Arias Noe and her husband and teenage son following their unsuccessful 
attempt to flee the country. CDR members left a threatening sign on 
their door and pounded on the family's front door; Arias said neighbors 
broke down a common door to intimidate the family. Arias and her husband 
received more than 10 police citations related to their attempted 
migration and were obliged to appear before the local police chief twice 
monthly.
Authorities occasionally threatened parents with the loss of custody of 
their children for taking part in "counterrevolutionary" activities. On 
August 19, a police officer visited the Havana home of Carla Vismari 
Santa Leon, a pro-democracy activist, and warned her mother that Carla 
and her activist husband could lose custody of their two-year-old son 
unless they halted their activities.
The government controlled all access to the Internet and took steps to 
censor all electronic mail, disallowing any attachments (see section 
2.a.). State Security often read international correspondence and 
monitored overseas telephone calls and conversations with foreigners. 
The government also monitored domestic phone calls and correspondence 
and sometimes denied telephone service to dissidents. State Security 
agents subjected journalists to harassment and surveillance, including 
electronic surveillance and surreptitious entry into their homes (see 
section 2.a.).
In March Lourdes Esquivel Vieyto reported that prison officials refused 
to give her letters written by her imprisoned husband during February.
There were numerous credible reports of forced evictions of squatters 
and residents who lacked official permission to reside in Havana and 
other major cities. On March 11, officials informed Barbaro Sanchez and 
two of his neighbors that they had to abandon their residences in 
Santiago de Cuba the next day. On March 12, officials demolished the 
homes because they were built without proper authorization, albeit on 
property owned by Mr. Sanchez and his neighbors.
On July 14, officials evicted Moises Leonardo and Roberto de Jesus 
Guerra, two members of the extralegal human rights organization 
Corriente Martiana from a fellow dissident's home on the grounds that 
the law prohibits citizens from changing residence without state approval.
The government sometimes punished family members for the activities of 
their relatives. On February 23, authorities expelled from school 
tenth-grade student Ernesto Luis Roque Veitia, the son of independent 
journalists Anna Rosa Veitia and Ernesto Roque. The stated reason for 
the expulsion was Roque Veitia's refusal to participate in a work brigade.
Section 2 Respect for Civil Liberties, Including:
a. Freedom of Speech and Press
The constitution provides for freedom of speech and of the press insofar 
as they "conform to the aims of socialist society," a clause effectively 
barring free speech, and in practice the government did not allow 
criticism of the revolution or its leaders. Laws against antigovernment 
propaganda, graffiti, and disrespect of officials impose penalties 
between three months and one year in prison; criticism of the president 
or members of the ANPP or Council of State is punishable by three years' 
imprisonment. Disseminating "enemy propaganda," which included 
expressing opinions at odds with those of the government, is punishable 
by up to 14 years' imprisonment.
The government considers such materials as the Universal Declaration of 
Human Rights, international reports of human rights violations, and 
mainstream foreign newspapers and magazines to be enemy propaganda. 
Local CDRs inhibited freedom of speech by monitoring and reporting 
dissent or criticism.
Police and State Security officials regularly harassed, threatened, and 
otherwise abused human rights advocates in public and private to 
intimidate them. The government subjected dissenters to "acts of 
repudiation." The government also obliged members of state-controlled 
mass organizations, co-workers, or neighbors of victims to stage public 
protests against those who dissented from the government's policies, for 
instance, by shouting obscenities and often causing damage to the homes 
and property of those targeted. Physical attacks on the victims and 
their family members sometimes occurred. Police and State Security 
agents often were present but took no action to prevent or end the 
attacks. Those who refused to participate in these actions faced 
disciplinary action, including loss of employment.
On March 19, four men forced their way into the home of dissident doctor 
Darsi Ferrer. They attacked him with a knife, seriously lacerated his 
right hand, and beat and threatened to kill him.
On May 8, a progovernment mob confronted and threatened the Ladies in 
White, spouses of political prisoners, as they took their weekly stroll 
after attending mass at Havana's Santa Rita church. Plainclothes 
government agents were visible at the scene.
On August 6, police arrested Albert Santiago DuBouchet, director of the 
independent Havana Press agency. He was subsequently sentenced to one 
year in prison for disrespect and resistance, a decision condemned by 
the Committee to Protect Journalists.
On September 16, in Santa Clara approximately 60 members of a 
progovernment mob struck independent journalist Guillermo Farinas with 
clubs after he took part in a protest outside a police station over the 
arrest of a dissident. The beating, which began after Farinas refused to 
say "Long Live Fidel Castro," left him badly bruised.
On October 16, a group of approximately 30 persons appeared outside the 
Havana home of veteran dissident Roberto de Miranda and during a 
four-hour period shouted insults at de Miranda and his wife.
In October and November, in the Villa Clara city of Manicaragua, 21 
prodemocracy and human rights activists accused the government of 
forbidding them to use public transportation, frequent restaurants, use 
public recreation facilities or receive visitors at home. The activists 
stated that their photos had been posted outside public establishments 
and grocery stores, so that workers would know whom not to serve.
The government reportedly threatened to take custody of children of some 
members of the political opposition. On November 7, a State Security 
official warned executive-turned-whistleblower Niurka Brito, "If you 
continue to have ties with the opposition, you could lose custody of 
your children."
The constitution provides that print and electronic media are 
inalienably state property. The government owned and the CP controlled 
all media except for a few small, unauthorized church-run publications. 
The law bars "clandestine printing" and provides for three to six 
months' imprisonment for failure to identify the author of a publication 
or the printing press used to produce the publication. Catholic 
church-run publications, denied access to mass printing equipment, were 
subject to governmental pressure. Vitral magazine, a publication of the 
diocese of Pinar del Rio, continued to publish during the year.
Citizens did not have the right to receive or possess publications from 
abroad, although newsstands in hotels for foreigners and certain hard 
currency stores sold foreign newspapers and magazines. The government 
continued to jam the transmissions of Radio Marti and Television Marti.
All media must operate under CP guidelines and reflect government views. 
The government also pressured groups normally outside official controls, 
such as visiting and resident international correspondents. Cars used by 
foreign journalists have unique license plates, enabling monitoring by 
the authorities. Expulsions lessened following the adoption of a 
stricter visa policy; the government barred some foreign journalists 
from entering the country.
Law 88 prohibits a broad range of activities that purportedly undermine 
state security. The law provides for fines and prison terms of 7 to 20 
years for each charge for anyone possessing or disseminating 
"subversive" literature or supplying information that U.S. authorities 
could use to apply U.S. legislation. At year's end 22 journalists 
arrested in 2003 for violating Law 88 remained in prison.
On March 24, journalist Oscar Mario Gonzalez was detained and 
interrogated by police. Police told him that he was considered one of 
the independent journalists most critical of the regime; the government 
continued to deny his request for an exit visa to visit his daughter.
On June 20, cartoonists in the city of Santa Clara were rounded up for 
interrogation after a series of antigovernment caricatures appeared in 
the city.
The government continued to subject independent journalists to: internal 
travel bans; arbitrary and periodic detentions (overnight or longer); 
harassment of family and friends; seizures of computers, office, and 
photographic equipment; and repeated threats of prolonged imprisonment. 
Independent journalists in Havana reported that threatening phone calls 
and harassment of family members continued during the year. Ministry of 
the Interior agents infiltrated and reported on independent journalists.
Authorities also placed journalists under house arrest to prevent them 
from reporting on human rights conferences and events and on court cases 
against activists (see section 1.d.). Police prevented independent 
journalists from covering "sensitive" events.
Authorities often confiscated journalists' equipment, especially 
photographic and recording equipment, on the grounds that it had been 
purchased illegally, despite receipted proof to the contrary. On 
November 29, state security officers in Santa Clara executed a search 
warrant to seize "counter-revolutionary" materials at the home of 
independent journalist Carlos Serpa Maceira. They reportedly confiscated 
his books, notes, radio, and two small recorders.
Resident foreign correspondents reported that intense government 
pressures, including official and informal complaints about articles, 
continued throughout the year. The government controlled resident 
foreign journalists by requiring them to obtain an exit permit each time 
they wished to leave the country. The government also required foreign 
correspondents to hire local staff from government agencies.
The government continued to control tightly distribution of information, 
including importation of foreign literature, which largely was 
unavailable to the public. The government frequently barred independent 
libraries from receiving materials from abroad and seized materials 
donated by foreign diplomats. The government prohibits diplomatic 
missions from printing or distributing publications, including 
newspapers and newspaper clippings, unless such publications exclusively 
address conditions in a mission's home country and prior government 
approval is received. Many missions did not accept this requirement and 
distributed prohibited materials.
On February 25, State Security agents entered the homes of Maria Elena 
Mir Marrero and Reinaldo Cosano Alen, directors of two independent 
libraries. The agents confiscated boxes containing books, radios, and 
copies of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
The government operated four national television stations, four national 
radio stations, one international radio station, one national magazine, 
and three national newspapers. Additionally, it operated many local 
radio stations, television stations, magazines, and newspapers. All were 
official organs of the CP, dedicated to promulgating its propaganda. 
Content was nearly uniform across all of these media; none reflected any 
degree of editorial independence. The regime tolerated the Catholic 
Church's publication and circulation of two magazines and several other 
publications but vigorously persecuted any other independent person or 
institution that attempted to distribute written, filmed, or 
photographed material. The only books published in the country were 
those published by the government, and state censors required 
pre-publication approval.
The government controlled all access to the Internet and subjected all 
electronic mail to review and censorship. In October Reporters without 
Borders noted that the government "does its best to keep its citizens 
away from the Internet." The Internet could be accessed only through 
government-approved institutions. Only foreigners were permitted to 
purchase Internet access cards from the national telephone monopoly, 
leading to a continued increase in clandestine Internet connections.
Direct Internet access was generally available only to certain 
government-approved individuals, including some doctors, professors, and 
journalists. The authorities continued to restrict the types and numbers 
of international Web sites that could be opened by citizens and did not 
permit church representatives to have Internet access. In November a 
foreign press account reported the government's acknowledgment that it 
blocked access to Web sites it considered to be terrorist, subversive, 
or pornographic.
On April 20, Internet access was suspended in Santiago de Cuba in 
anticipation of local elections. An employee of the only Internet cafe 
in the city reported that the Internet service provider routinely cut 
service any time a politically significant event took place.
The government restricted academic freedom and continued to emphasize 
the importance of reinforcing revolutionary ideology and discipline. 
Academics were prohibited from meeting with some diplomats without prior 
government approval. The Ministry of Education required teachers to 
evaluate students' and their parents' ideological character and to place 
such evaluations in school records. These reports directly affected 
students' educational and career prospects. Government policy required 
teaching materials for courses such as mathematics or literature to have 
ideological content. Ideological indoctrination began with textbooks for 
students in the early primary grades. Government-controlled public 
libraries denied access to books or information unless the requester 
produces a government letter of permission.
Academics whom the government allowed to travel abroad were aware that 
their actions, if deemed politically unfavorable, could negatively 
impact those back home.
b. Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Association
Although the constitution grants limited rights of assembly and 
association, these rights are subject to the requirement that they may 
not be "exercised against the existence and objectives of the Socialist 
State."
Freedom of Assembly
The law punishes any unauthorized assembly of more than three persons, 
including those for private religious services in private homes, by up 
to three months in prison and a fine. The authorities selectively 
enforced this prohibition and often used it as a pretext to harass and 
imprison human rights advocates.
On May 20, the government permitted a meeting in Havana of the Assembly 
to Promote Civil Society. Approximately 150 members and observers 
attended. However, two European journalists who sought to cover the 
event were expelled from the country, and for months afterwards, the 
government subjected participants to harassment, arrest, and other 
abuses. For example, on July 22, leaders of the Assembly for the 
Promotion of Civil Society Martha Beatriz Roque and Rene Gomez Manzano 
were among approximately 30 people arrested en route to a demonstration 
(see section 1.e.)
The authorities never have approved a public meeting by a human rights 
group and often detained activists to prevent them from attending 
meetings, demonstrations, or ceremonies. Unapproved meetings and 
demonstrations took place, which the government frequently disrupted, 
infiltrated, or attempted to prevent. Authorities sometimes used or 
incited violence against peaceful demonstrators.
On January 20, government agents assembled more than 500 people in the 
streets outside the house of Gerardo Lazcano Naranjo in efforts to 
disrupt a peaceful gathering at his home.
On July 13, authorities in Havana mobilized a Rapid Reaction Brigade 
against a small group convening at the city's sea wall for a peaceful 
commemoration ceremony. Brigade members verbally attacked and threatened 
the peaceful vigil, and police took into custody 30 participants, 7 of 
whom remained in custody at year's end. On August 12, at the instigation 
of the authorities, approximately 80 persons filled the streets in front 
of the home of Vladimiro Roca, leader of the outlawed political group 
Todos Unidos, thus preventing members of the group from attending a 
scheduled meeting.
On August 27, dissident doctor Darsi Ferrer organized a meeting of 
doctors and public health workers in Havana, which became the object of 
an "act of repudiation." A government-organized mob blocked and jostled 
would-be participants and hurled abuse at those inside.
On December 10, 13 pro-democracy activists gathered in Sancti Spiritus 
at the home of Irma Gomez Ortiz to mark Human Rights Day. A crowd of 70 
people, including CP members, massed out front, shouting insults at 
those inside.
Freedom of Association
The law specifically prohibits unrecognized groups, and the government 
generally denied citizens the freedom of association. The authorities 
never have approved the existence of a human rights group; however, a 
number of professional associations operated as nongovernmental 
organizations (NGOs) without legal recognition, including the 
Association of Independent Teachers, the Association of Independent 
Lawyers, the Association of Independent Architects and Engineers, and 
several independent journalist organizations. The constitution 
proscribes any political organization other than the CP (see section 3).
Recognized churches (see section 2.c.), the Roman Catholic humanitarian 
organization Caritas, the Freemason movement, and a number of fraternal 
or professional organizations were the only associations permitted to 
function outside the control or influence of the state, the CP, and 
their mass organizations. The authorities continued to ignore 
applications from new groups for legal recognition, thereby subjecting 
members to potential charges of illegal association.
c. Freedom of Religion
Although the constitution recognizes the right of citizens to profess 
and practice any religious belief within the framework of respect for 
the law, the government continued to restrict freedom of religion. The 
government requires churches and other religious groups to enroll with 
the provincial registry of associations within the Ministry of the 
Interior to obtain official recognition. The government did not place 
any numerical limits on admissions to Catholic seminaries, and there 
were no constraints on ordination. In practice the government appeared 
to halt registration of new denominations, although no groups were known 
to have applied for registration during the year. The government 
tolerated some relatively new religions, such as the Baha'i Faith and a 
small congregation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. 
Officials frequently harassed and repressed unregistered religious groups.
The Ministry of Interior engaged in active efforts to control and 
monitor religious institutions, particularly through surveillance, 
infiltration, and harassment of religious professionals and 
practitioners. State Security officials visited priests and pastors 
prior to significant religious events to warn that dissidents were 
trying to "use the church." In many churches, most noticeably at Santa 
Rita's, in front of which relatives of political prisoners, the "Ladies 
in White," staged a weekly march for their release, State Security 
agents attended Mass for intimidation purposes.
Although it did not favor any one particular religion or church, the 
government appeared to be most tolerant of those churches that 
maintained close relations to the state through the Cuban Council of 
Churches (CCC), which often supported government policies.
The government, with rare exceptions, prohibited the construction of new 
churches, forcing many growing congregations to seek permits to meet in 
private homes. On February 18 the congregation of a Pentecostal parish 
in Havana rejected the government's order to demolish their church on 
the grounds that it was constructed illegally.
The government introduced a regulation to "legalize" thousands of 
private homes used for occasional church services; it set forth a number 
of requirements, including that the house host no more than three 
meetings per week and not be located within 1.2 miles of another such 
house. Some Protestants, whose congregations have grown in recent years, 
expressed worry that the regulation was aimed at them.
On January 7, Ismari de Armas lost her job at a Pinar del Rio sewing 
shop. The administrators of the state-owned shop told her they could not 
trust her because she was a Jehovah's Witness.
Education is secular, and no religious educational institutions are 
allowed; however, the Catholic Church, Protestant churches, and Jewish 
synagogues were permitted to offer religious education classes to their 
members.
Religious literature and materials must be imported through a registered 
religious group and may be distributed only to officially recognized 
religious groups.
The CCC continued to broadcast a monthly 15-minute radio program on 
condition that it not include material of a political nature.
On January 6, priests of the babalawo cult reported that government 
officials visited them to pressure them to assimilate with the 
government-sanctioned Yoruba Cultural Association (YCA); inquired about 
membership roles, including the number of foreigners involved in the 
church; and informed the priests that if they sought to leave country 
all of their icons would be confiscated, unless they had a YCA 
membership card.
Societal Abuses and Discrimination
There were no reports of societal violence, harassment, or 
discrimination against members of religious groups. There were between 
1,000 and 1,500 members of the Jewish community. There were no reports 
of overtly anti-Semitic acts.
For a more detailed discussion, see the 2005 International Religious 
Freedom Report
d. Freedom of Movement Within the Country, Foreign
Travel, Emigration, and Repatriation
The law qualifies these rights, and the government severely restricted 
foreign travel and emigration. Although it generally did not restrict 
domestic travel, the government limited internal migration to Havana. 
State Security officials prohibited some human rights advocates and 
independent journalists from traveling outside their home provinces.
Although the law allows all citizens to travel anywhere within the 
country, residence is heavily restricted, thus impeding the right to 
move. The local housing commission and provincial government authorities 
consider requests for change of residence largely on the basis of 
housing space. According to the Cuban Commission for Human Rights, the 
system is fraught with corruption. During the wait for permission, which 
routinely lasts six months or more, the applicant cannot obtain food 
rations or a local identification card. Police frequently checked the 
identification of persons on the streets, and anyone from another 
province living in Havana illegally may be fined and sent home. While 
the regulation was in effect nationwide, it was applied most frequently 
in Havana. Afro-Cubans from the more impoverished eastern provinces were 
disproportionately affected by this regulation.
On July 14, independent journalist Lamasiel Gutierrez Romero was taken 
into custody for several hours when she purchased a plane ticket to 
travel from her home on the Isla de Juventud to Havana. While in 
custody, she was beaten, held without food or water, and threatened with 
imprisonment for up to two years.
In September independent journalist Amarilis Cortina Rey was fined for 
living "without official permission" in the Havana house her grandfather 
purchased in 1924 and for which she was the only heiress. Residency law 
was enforced selectively in her case, likely because of Cortina's work 
as an independent journalist. A similar incident occurred in December 
when a neighbor of activist Martha Beatriz Roque was evicted, almost 
certainly because of her friendship with Roque.
The government imposed restrictions on both emigration and temporary 
foreign travel, mainly by requiring an exit permit. Although the 
government allowed the majority of persons who qualified for immigrant 
or refugee status in other countries to depart, thousands of citizens 
who received foreign travel documents were denied exit permits during 
the year. Most were doctors, nurses, and other health professionals. 
Others denied exit permits included young men of military age and 
citizens with certain political or religious beliefs. On December 14, 
the "Ladies in White"--relatives of political prisoners--were denied 
exit permits to receive the Sakharov Prize awarded to them by the 
European Parliament.
The government banned some of the professionals who were denied exit 
permits from working in their occupational fields or subjected them to 
arbitrary punishment. For instance, Doctor Amarilys Lorenzo Contreras 
and her dentist husband, Adalberto Dorrego Torres, were allowed to 
continue in their professions but were transferred to inferior 
government clinics after they sought exit permits.
Resolution 54 denies exit permits to medical professionals until they 
have performed three to five years of service in their profession after 
requesting permission to travel abroad. This regulation, which was 
normally applied to recent graduates, remained officially unpublished.
The denial of exit permits to men of military age usually covered 
individuals age 18 to 27; however, in most cases involving migration 
under the 1994 US-Cuba Migration Accords, the applicants eventually 
received exemption from obligatory service and were granted exit permits.
The government denied exit permits for several years to relatives of 
individuals who migrated illegally (for example, merchant seamen and 
sports figures who defected while out of the country). The government 
frequently withheld exit visas to control dissidents.
Jorge Olivera, one of the 75 political prisoners summarily convicted in 
2003, requested exit permission on January 6 and at year's end remained 
waiting for a response. Juan Carlos Gonzalez Leiva, former political 
prisoner and current political activist, reported that eight of his 
relatives, including his parents, sister, and her family, have waited 
since January for exit permits.
On January 17, authorities revoked the exit permit of Nelida Hernandez 
de Llano, a member of the Christian Liberation Movement. She and her 
family had qualified for refugee status abroad.
On September 20, police prevented dissident Miguel Sigler, his wife 
Josefa Lopez, and their two children from leaving the country as 
refugees, despite approved documentation. The family returned to Havana 
where they were forced to stay with friends because the government had 
already seized their house in Matanzas. On Sepember 27, as Lopez walked 
along a Havana street, an assailant beat her, declaring that it was a 
warning to her and her husband. On October 5, the Sigler family was 
allowed to emigrate.
The government also used both internal and external exile to control 
internal opposition. The law permits authorities to bar an individual 
from a certain area or to restrict an individual to a certain area for a 
period of 1 to 10 years. Under this provision, authorities may exile any 
person whose presence in a given location is considered "socially 
dangerous."
The government routinely invoked forced exile as a condition for 
political prisoner releases and also pressured activists to leave the 
country to escape future prosecution.
Migrants must pay processing fees (approximately $180 [4,500 pesos] for 
exit permission, $66 [1,650 pesos] for a passport, and $30 [750 pesos] 
for an airport tax), that amount to approximately 23 months' salary for 
the average citizen. Migrants to the United States faced an additional 
charge of approximately $720 (18 thousand pesos or 5 years' salary) for 
adults and $480 (12 thousand pesos) for children. These fees represented 
a significant hardship, particularly for political refugees, many of 
whom were fired from their jobs for being "politically unreliable" and 
had no income. At year's end some refugees were unable to leave the 
country because of inability to pay exit fees. Authorities routinely 
dispossessed refugees and their families of their homes and most of 
their belongings before permitting them to leave the country.
The law provides for imprisonment of up to 3 years or a fine of $12 to 
$40 (300 to 1,000 pesos) for unauthorized departures by boat or raft. 
The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) stated that 
it regarded imprisonment of more than one year for simple illegal exit 
as excessive. Under the terms of the 1994 US-Cuba Migration Accord, the 
government agreed not to prosecute or retaliate against migrants 
returned from international or US waters, or from the US Naval Base at 
Guantanamo, after attempting to emigrate illegally if they had not 
committed a separate criminal offense. However, in practice some persons 
repatriated under the terms of the Accord reported harassment and 
discrimination.
Protection of Refugees
Although the country is not a party to the 1951 UN Convention Relating 
to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 protocol, the constitution 
provides for the granting of asylum to individuals persecuted for their 
ideals or actions involving a number of specified political grounds. 
Although the government has no formal mechanism to process asylum for 
foreign nationals, in practice it provided protection against 
refoulement, the return of persons to a country where they feared 
persecution.
The government had an established system to provide assistance to 
refugees. During the year 39 persons applied for refugee status, of whom 
10 were approved; according to the UNHCR, there were 708 refugees in the 
country. The government cooperated with the UNHCR, and provided 
temporary protection to a small number of persons.
Section 3 Respect for Political Rights: The Right of Citizens to Change 
their Government
While the constitution provides for direct election of provincial, 
municipal, and ANPP members, citizens do not have the right to change 
their government, and the government retaliated against those who sought 
peaceful political change. The constitution, which proscribes any 
political organization other than the CP, defines socialism as its 
"irrevocable" basis. Candidates for provincial and national office must 
be approved in advance by mass organizations controlled by the 
government. In practice a small group of leaders, under the direction of 
the president, selected the members of the highest policy-making bodies 
of the CP, the Politburo, and the Central Committee.
The government continued to reject the petition for a national 
referendum on political and economic reforms known as the Varela 
Project, despite more than 40 thousand signatures.
Elections and Political Participation
In 2003 there were national elections in which 609 candidates were 
approved to compete for the 609 seats in the National Assembly. The CP 
was the only political party allowed to participate in the elections. A 
small minority of candidates did not belong formally to the CP but were 
chosen through the same government-controlled selection process. The 
government saturated the media and used government ministries, CP 
entities, and mass organizations to urge voters to cast a "unified vote" 
where marking one box automatically selected all candidates on the 
ballot form.
During the year there were elections for nearly 15 thousand local 
representatives to the municipal assemblies. After the first run-off 
election, the government reported that 96.6 percent of the electorate 
had voted. While the law allows citizens not to vote, CDRs often 
pressured neighborhood residents to cast ballots. According to the Cuban 
Commission for Human Rights, the government blacklisted those who did 
not vote.
Although not a formal requirement, in practice CP membership was a 
prerequisite for high-level official positions and professional advancement.
The government rejected any change to the political system that it 
judged incompatible with the revolution and ignored or actively 
suppressed calls for democratic reform. After the Christian Liberation 
Movement, led by Oswaldo Paya, submitted to the National Assembly two 
petitions (known as the Varela Project) proposing a national referendum 
on political and economic reforms, the National Assembly in 2003 
unanimously passed an amendment making socialism the irrevocable basis 
of the constitution.
Varela organizers continued to collect signatures in support of their 
proposal; however, activists reported increased harassment by State 
Security agents. Authorities arrested and detained Varela activists, 
confiscated signatures, fined and threatened activists and signers, and 
forced signers to rescind signatures. State Security impersonated 
canvassing volunteers and increasingly infiltrated the ranks of 
activists. In May and June, Oswaldo Paya reported State Security agents 
visited and pressured more than 50 Varela Project signatories to retract 
their signatures and denounce the Varela Project activists who had 
collected their signatures.
There were 2 women in the 24-member Politburo and 22 in the 150-member 
Central Committee. Women held 5 seats in the 390 member-Council of State 
and 219 seats in the 609-seat National Assembly.
While the 2002 census recorded that blacks and persons of partial 
African descent account for 35 percent of the population, according to 
the 2002 census, some observers estimated that Afro-Cubans made up 50 
percent or more of the population. Persons of African descent held 6 
seats in the 24-member Politburo. Following the selection of the new 
ANPP in 2003, the government reported its composition as 67 percent 
white, 22 percent black, and 11 percent mixed race.
Government Corruption and Transparency
Independent and official press reported incidents of government 
corruption. In October the government acknowledged massive corruption at 
state-run gas stations and ordered youth brigades to take over their 
operations. Also during the year, the government released statistics 
indicating that prosecutors over the past three years had made 16 
thousand accusations for economic crimes at state-run companies.
The law provides for public access to government information, but in 
practice requests for information routinely were rejected, often on the 
grounds that access was not a right. Many convicts and their defense 
attorneys never received a copy of the sentence certification to which 
they were legally entitled.
Section 4 Governmental Attitude Regarding International and
Nongovernmental Investigation of Alleged Violations of Human Rights
In violation of its own statutes, the government did not recognize any 
domestic human rights groups or permit them to function legally. Several 
human rights organizations continued to function outside the law, 
including the Cuban Commission for Human Rights and National 
Reconciliation, the Cuban Committee for Human Rights, and the Cuban 
Human Rights Party. The government subjected domestic human rights 
advocates to intense intimidation and harassment, including threats of 
disappearance. For example, on September 17 in Pinar del Rio city, State 
Security agents visited the home of human rights activist Virgilio Pita 
Rivero and told his wife that if he did not end his activities, they 
would "make him disappear."
State Security officials often infiltrated human rights organizations 
and subjected them to constant surveillance. Public identification of 
suspected state infiltrators was a crime punishable by 8 to 15 years' 
imprisonment.
The government took various steps to restrict the operation of domestic 
human rights NGOs that advocated or criticized the government's human 
rights policies. Government authorities regularly threatened NGOs with 
prosecution under the Penal Code provisions of "dangerousness" (see 
section 1.a.) Both the UN Commission on Human Rights (UNCHR) and the 
IACHR criticized this tactic for its arbitrariness, the summary nature 
of the judicial proceedings employed, the lack of legal safeguards, and 
the political considerations behind its application. Private individuals 
acting in response to government instigation and coercion often harassed 
members of human rights NGOs; crowds assembled at their homes prevented 
access, intimidated people, and sometimes caused material damage.
The government rejected international human rights monitoring, did not 
recognize the mandate of the UNCHR, and refused to acknowledge requests 
by the Personal Representative of the Commissioner on Human Rights, to 
visit the country. Meanwhile, the UNCHR renewed the status of the 
personal representative.
Section 5 Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons
The constitution prohibits discrimination based on race, gender, 
disability, or social status, however, racial discrimination occurred 
frequently.
Women
The law prohibits threats and inflicting injuries, including those 
associated with domestic violence. Human rights advocates reported that 
violence against women was a problem, and police often did not act on 
cases of domestic violence. Violent crime rarely was reported in the 
press, and there was no available data regarding the extent of domestic 
violence.
The law criminalizes rape (though it was unclear whether that included 
spousal rape) and stipulates penalties ranging from 4 to 10 years' 
imprisonment. If two or more rapists are involved, or if the rapist had 
been convicted previously of the same offense, sentences could reach 15 
years. If the victim is under 12, or if the act results in injuries or 
grave illness, capital punishment is possible. The government enforced 
the law.
Prostitution is legal for persons over age 17, but pandering and 
economic activities facilitating prostitution, including room rentals, 
are illegal. Large numbers of foreign tourists visited the country 
specifically to patronize prostitutes, and sex tourism was a problem. 
Some street police officers were suspected of providing protection to 
individuals engaged in prostitution, who were numerous and visible in 
Havana and other major cities.
The law provides penalties for sexual harassment, with potential 
sentences of three months to five years' imprisonment. The rigor of 
enforcement and the extent of the problem were unclear. The law was 
applied most frequently to male supervisors "abusing their power" with 
female subordinates, according to the Cuban Commission for Human Rights.
The law provides that women and men have equal rights and 
responsibilities regarding marriage, divorce, raising children, 
maintaining the home, and pursuing a career. The law grants working 
mothers preferential access to goods and services. The law provides for 
equal pay for equal work, and women generally received pay comparable to 
men for similar work.
Children
The law provides that all children have equal rights and that parents 
have a duty to ensure their protection. Public education was free 
through the university level. The law requires school attendance until 
the ninth grade, which was the highest level achieved by most children. 
The government reported that 99.4 percent of primary-school-age children 
were enrolled in school during the 2004-05 schoolyear, while UNICEF 
recorded that 93.1 percent of secondary-school-age children were 
enrolled in the 2003-04 school year. All elementary and secondary school 
students received obligatory ideological indoctrination.
Boys and girls had equal access to a national health care system that 
covered all citizens. UNICEF reported high vaccination rates for 
childhood diseases. Children up to age seven received additional food 
rations through the ration card system.
Although seldom covered in the official media, there were occasional 
reports of child abuse, but there was no societal pattern of child 
abuse. Researchers released the results of a six-year study of child 
abuse in the Santiago area, conducted by the Superior Institute of 
Medical Sciences, which found that 50 percent of children aged 8 to 10 
reported having been punched or kicked following the ingestion of 
alcohol by their parents.
Police officers who found children loitering in the streets or begging 
from tourists frequently intervened and tried to find the parents. If a 
child was found bothering tourists more than once, police frequently 
fined the child's parents. During their summer vacation, students were 
pressured to enlist for up to a week of "volunteer labor" at work camps 
in rural areas.
Child prostitution was a problem, with young girls engaging in 
prostitution to help support themselves and their families (see section 
5, Trafficking). Children may marry with the consent of their parents at 
age 14, but the law provides for 2 to 5 years' imprisonment for anyone 
who "induces minors under 16 years of age to practice homosexuality or 
prostitution."
Trafficking in Persons
The law prohibits all forms of trafficking in persons, and there were no 
reports that persons were trafficked to or from the country. Trafficking 
for underage prostitution and forced labor occurred within the country
The law criminalizes promoting or organizing the entrance of persons 
into, or the exit of persons from, the country for the purpose of 
prostitution; violators were subject to 20 to 30 years' imprisonment.
The Ministries of Justice and Education, the PNR, and local governments 
are tasked with different facets of combating trafficking in persons and 
the problem of underage prostitution; no entity had complete autonomy 
dealing with these problems. The police were tasked with investigating 
and arresting traffickers; the Ministry of Justice with prosecuting and 
incarcerating traffickers; and the Ministry of Education with 
rehabilitating prostitutes, including underage prostitutes. No 
information was available concerning government assistance with 
international investigations of trafficking or the extradition of 
traffickers.
While underage prostitution was widely apparent, there were no reliable 
statistics available regarding its extent. Although the police generally 
enforced laws on underage prostitution, the phenomenon continued, with 
cabarets and discos catering to sex tourists. The government prosecuted 
persons involved in child prostitution and child pornography and 
assisted other countries in international investigations of child sexual 
abuse.
Trafficking victims came from all over the country, and most worked in 
the major cities and tourist resort areas. Anecdotal information 
indicated that victims came from poor families; in many cases, families 
encouraged victims to enter into prostitution.
There was no information available regarding traffickers and their methods.
There were anecdotal reports of police officers receiving bribes to 
allow exploitation of minors for prostitution.
Individuals engaged in prostitution, including possible trafficking 
victims and children, often were treated as criminals, detained, and 
taken to rehabilitation centers.
No civil society groups in the country assisted trafficking victims in 
an official capacity.
Persons with Disabilities
There was no known law prohibiting official discrimination against 
persons with disabilities in employment, education, access to health 
care, or in the provision of other state services; however, a Labor 
Ministry resolution gives persons with disabilities the right to equal 
employment opportunities, and to equal pay for equal work. There was no 
official discrimination against persons with disabilities. There are no 
laws mandating accessibility to buildings for persons with disabilities, 
and in practice, buildings and transportation rarely were accessible to 
persons with disabilities.
The Special Education Division of the Ministry of Education was 
responsible for the education and training of children with 
disabilities. The Ministry of Labor and Social Security was in charge of 
the Job Program for the Handicapped.
National/Racial/Ethnic Minorities
Although there were many black police officers and army enlisted 
personnel, racial discrimination often occurred. Blacks complained of 
frequent and disproportionate stops for identity checks.
Other Societal Abuses and Discrimination
Societal discrimination against homosexuals persisted, as police 
occasionally conducted sweeps in areas where homosexuals congregated, 
particularly along sections of Havana's waterfront.
The government restricted persons found to be HIV-positive to 
sanatoriums for treatment and therapy before conditionally releasing 
them into the community. Even after their release, some persons with 
HIV/AIDS said the government monitored their movements with a de-facto 
chaperone to prevent the spread of the illness. HIV/AIDS sufferers also 
asserted that state medical professionals frequently failed to respect 
confidentiality, with the result that their condition was known widely 
throughout their neighborhoods. Some persons with HIV/AIDS said the 
government only offered them jobs incompatible with their medical condition.
Section 6 Worker Rights
a. The Right of Association
The law does not allow workers to form and join unions of their choice. 
Rather, the state established official unions and did not permit 
competing independent unions. Official labor unions have a mobilization 
function and do not act as trade unions, promote worker rights, or 
protect the right to strike. Such organizations were under the control 
of the state and the CP, which also managed the enterprises for which 
the laborers worked. Because all legal unions were government entities, 
antiunion discrimination by definition did not exist.
The CP selects the leaders of the sole legal labor confederation, the 
Confederation of Cuban Workers (CTC), whose principal responsibility is 
to ensure that government production goals are met. Virtually all 
workers were required to belong to the CTC, and promotions were 
frequently limited to CP members who take part in mandatory marches, 
public humiliations of dissidents, and other state-organized activities.
Workers often lost their jobs because of their political beliefs, 
including their refusal to join the official union. Several small 
independent labor organizations were created, although they functioned 
without legal recognition. These organizations also were subject to 
infiltration by government agents and were unable to represent workers 
effectively or work on their behalf.
On January 11, independent union organizer Juan Antonio Salazar was 
arbitrarily detained by police while he was walking down the street. 
Police threatened to charge Salazar with "threatening behavior" but 
after several hours released him without charges.
b. The Right to Organize and Bargain Collectively
Although provided for in the law, collective bargaining does not exist 
in practice. The State Committee for Work and Social Security sets wages 
and salaries for the state sector, which is virtually the only employer 
in the country. The law does not provide for strikes, and none were 
known to have occurred during the year. There are no special laws or 
exemptions from regular labor laws in the three export processing zones.
The law denies all workers, except those with special government 
permission, the right to contract directly with foreign companies 
investing in the country. Although a few firms negotiated exceptions, 
the government required foreign investors and diplomatic missions to 
contract workers through state employment agencies, which were paid in 
foreign currency, but which, in turn, paid workers very low wages in 
pesos (see section 6.e.) Workers subcontracted by state employment 
agencies must meet certain political qualifications. The state 
employment agencies consulted with the CP, the CTC, and the Union of 
Communist Youth to ensure that the workers chosen "deserved" to work in 
a joint enterprise.
c. Prohibition of Forced or Compulsory Labor
The law does not prohibit forced or compulsory labor by adults. The 
government maintained correctional centers for persons convicted of such 
crimes as "dangerousness" (see section 1.a.). Prisoners held in such 
centers were forced to work on farms or at sites performing 
construction, agricultural, or metal work. The authorities also often 
imprisoned persons sent to work sites who refused to work.
On July 5, Ernesto Arocha Carta, a retiree who had been declared 
disabled, filed a complaint with the Ministry of Justice protesting his 
sentence to one year's house arrest, which included forced labor.
The law prohibits forced or compulsory labor by children, but there were 
reports that such practices occurred (see section 6.d.).
d. Prohibition of Child Labor and Minimum Age for Employment
The law prohibits forced and compulsory labor by children, and the 
Ministry of Labor and Social Security was responsible for enforcement. 
Nonetheless, the government required children to work in various situations.
Students at rural boarding schools were expected to participate in 
several hours of manual labor per day. Secondary school students were 
expected to devote up to 15 days of their summer vacation completing a 
variety of tasks ranging from farm labor to urban cleanup projects and 
were paid a small wage for this labor. Students in post-secondary 
institutions (technical schools, university preparatory schools, and 
agricultural institutes) were expected to devote 30 to 45 days per year 
to primarily agricultural work. Refusal to do agricultural work could 
result in expulsion from school.
The legal minimum working age is 17, but the Labor Code permits the 
employment of 15- and 16-year-old children to obtain training or to fill 
labor shortages. The Labor Code does not permit teenagers to work more 
than 7 hours per day or 40 hours per week or on holidays. Children age 
13 to 18 cannot work in specified hazardous occupations, such as mining, 
or at night.
e. Acceptable Conditions of Work
The minimum wage, which is enforced by the labor ministry, varies by 
occupation. On average, the minimum monthly wage approximated $9 (225 
pesos). The government supplemented the minimum wage with free 
education, subsidized medical care (daily pay is reduced by 40 percent 
after the third day of being admitted to a hospital), housing, and some 
subsidized food. Even with subsidies, the minimum wage did not provide a 
decent standard of living for a worker and family.
The government required foreign companies in joint ventures with state 
entities to hire and pay workers through the state (see section 6.b.). 
HRW noted that the required reliance on state-controlled employment 
agencies left workers without any capacity directly to negotiate wages, 
benefits, the basis of promotions, or the length of the workers' trial 
period at the job with the employer. Foreign companies paid the 
government as much as $500 to $600 per worker per month; however, 
because the government paid salaries in nonconvertible pesos, workers 
only received 5 percent of the money foreign companies paid to the 
government for their services.
The standard workweek was 44 hours, with shorter workweeks in hazardous 
occupations, such as mining. The law provides workers with a weekly 
24-hour rest period. These standards were effectively enforced. The law 
does not provide for premium pay for overtime or prohibit obligatory 
overtime. Workers were occasionally asked to work overtime at their 
usual, non-overtime rate; refusal to do so could result in a notation in 
the employee's official work history that could imperil any subsequent 
request for vacation time.
Laws providing for workplace environmental and safety controls were 
inadequate, and the government lacked effective enforcement mechanisms. 
In December the government announced that in the first 11 months of the 
year, 90 people died in work-related accidents, compared with 72 for the 
same period in 2004. The law provides that a worker who considers his 
life in danger because of hazardous conditions has the right to refuse 
to work in a position or not to engage in specific activities until such 
risks are eliminated; the worker remains obligated to work temporarily 
in whatever other position may be assigned him at a salary provided for 
under the law.
http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2005/61723.htm
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment