By Humberto Márquez
CARACAS, Mar 3, 2010 (IPS) - The deafening silence of Latin American
governments has fallen like another shovelful of earth on the grave of
Cuban dissident Orlando Zapata, a bricklayer who died Feb. 23 after
nearly three months on hunger strike in prison on the Caribbean island.
"Human rights problems exist all over the world," said Marco Aurelio
García, foreign affairs adviser to leftwing Brazilian President Luiz
Inácio Lula da Silva, who said for his part that he "deeply regretted
that a person should let himself die by hunger strike, which was
something I did when I was a trade unionist but would not do again."
Only Chile's rightwing President-elect Sebastián Piñera issued a
statement harshly condemning the circumstances surrounding the death of
Zapata, who he said "gave his life to defend democracy and freedom in Cuba."
Studiedly neutral statements were made in other countries, like that of
Ecuadorean Foreign Minister Ricardo Patiño, who said "we regret the
death of this gentleman (Zapata) as we will always regret the death of
any human being. But I would rather not comment on the concrete issue of
the prisoners held in Cuba."
The United States and the European Union condemned Zapata's death and
called for the immediate release of 200 persons regarded by the Cuban
Commission for Human Rights, a dissident group in Cuba, as prisoners of
conscience, or political prisoners, a classification systematically
denied by the government in Havana.
The regional political agenda has been busy, packed with meetings
between presidents for different reasons, such as the earthquake in
Chile or the swearing-in of the new Uruguayan President José Mujica,
after a summit held February in Mexico that approved the creation of a
Community of Latin American and Caribbean States that includes Cuba but
expressly excludes Canada and the United States.
The region "kept silence as if to avoid embarrassing Cuba and President
Raúl Castro when he had just announced this OAS-style (Organisation of
American States) group without Canada and the United States," María
Teresa Romero, a professor of International Studies at the Central
University of Venezuela, told IPS.
"This is nothing new; it's the strategy of assimilation and pacification
as opposed to isolationism, that Latin America and the Caribbean have
followed before in relation to Havana, thinking that a more permissive
approach and co-opting Cuba will be a more effective means of guiding it
along the path to democracy," Romero added.
Tomás Bilbao, a member of the Cuba Study Group in Washington, founded in
2000 to monitor policies on Cuba, said that the silence about Zapata
reflects "the double-think of the leftwing leaders who predominate in
the region, who believe that criticising Cuba means backing the White
House."
Cuban historian Rafael Rojas, who lives in Mexico, said the Havana
government "made a fine calculation of the reactions likely to arise
from the United States and the European Union, in contrast with the very
few words they expected from Latin America."
These views support statements by Zapata's family members and human
rights organisations like Amnesty International, who claim the
government "let him die" by denying him recognition as a political
prisoner, treating him harshly and punishing him in prison, and
providing medical care only when it was already too late.
During a visit by the Brazilian president to Havana, the day after
Zapata died Raúl Castro told Brazilian journalists in Lula's entourage
that he regretted Zapata's demise, adding "no one is tortured, no one
has been tortured, there was no execution. That sort of thing happens in
Guantánamo," referring to the U.S. naval base in eastern Cuba where
prisoners of war have been held for years.
Former president Fidel Castro, who also met with Lula, wrote: "Lula has
known for many years that in our country, nobody was every tortured, no
adversary's assassination was ever ordered, and the people have never
been lied to."
Venezuelan political scientist Carlos Raúl Hernández told IPS that "the
behaviours adopted in response to Zapata's hunger strike and death
illustrate the struggle between the political stances represented by the
two Castro brothers who lead Cuba."
According to Hernández, "Raúl would probably like to advance towards
more openness, at first on the economic front, as has happened in China
and Vietnam, but Fidel may have persuaded him of the dilemma between
giving, or not giving, signs of weakness or retreat, by Cuba of all
countries, right now when the revolution has made strides in Latin America."
Hernández was alluding to Cuba sympathisers along with their socialist
discourse who have attained positions of power, particularly Presidents
Hugo Chávez of Venezuela, Evo Morales of Bolivia and, to a lesser
extent, Rafael Correa in Ecuador and Daniel Ortega in Nicaragua.
Other governments may have kept mum to avoid further inflaming the
conflict between supporters of Raúl and Fidel Castro's political lines,
opting instead for a strategy of pacification, he said.
"The hardening of Havana's political line means that Fidel Castro - who
gave up the presidency for health reasons - has recovered power in Cuba,
with the support of Venezuela," which has cooperation and trade
agreements with the island amounting to billions of dollars, in
Hernández's view.
In July 2011, Venezuela will host the next Latin America and Caribbean
Summit, which could see the inauguration of the new community of nations.
"But what will this non-OAS community be like? Without a democratic
charter, without a convention on human rights and bodies to enforce
them?" Simón Alberto Consalvi wondered. A former Venezuelan foreign
minister, he was one of the architects of the Contadora Group working
for peace in Central America in the 1980s.
The original Contadora Group created in 1983, made up of Colombia,
Mexico, Panama and Venezuela, soon grew to a total of eight democratic
states, and gave rise to the Rio Group, the region's main policy-sharing
body that has expanded until the admission of Cuba last year, and now
forms the basis of the new regional community of states.
Romero said "it appears, in fact, that the Rio Group is the model some
people prefer for the new community of nations, as it is more informal
and lacks the commitments and institutional basis of the OAS."
President Chávez has no such doubts, and recently repeated that "the OAS
is no longer of any use, one day it will disappear," while the nations
of Latin America and the Caribbean should create a joint mechanism
"based on transparent relations founded on respect for the sovereignty
of each country and on non-interference with internal affairs."
Cuba was expelled from the OAS in 1962, and has repeatedly said it has
no interest in rejoining the inter-American organisation, even though
the hemispheric body voted in 2009 to revoke Cuba's suspension. (END)
LATIN AMERICA: Subdued Response to Cuban Dissident's Death - IPS
ipsnews.net (3 March 2010)
http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=50537
No comments:
Post a Comment