Jeovany J. Vega, Translator: lapizcero
The eternal dilemma, to be or not to be, is the capital crossroad that
became evident in the life of every Cuban since the 26th of July 1953.
This date initiated the stage of struggle that placed into tension the
Cuban society of that moment. The verticality that that generation
imposed on the enterprise was conducive to the victory of 1959, gave
culmination to an exploit that was supported by the majority of sectors
of Cuban society of the time. The Revolution triumphed amidst absolute
popular jubilation, with the unconditional support of more than 90% of
the population. A contribution to this was the discontent engendered by
the deep social and political crisis into which Fulgencio Batista and
his horde of assassins and corrupts sank the country after their taking
of power with the military coup of March of 1952. This, along with the
tradition of struggle that spanned the first half of the last century,
created the conditions for the overthrow of that dictatorship.
After the triumph, the official discourse, gradually more and more
radical, led to, among other consequences, what I would call the great
error of the Cuban Revolution: The "revolutionary offensive" of 1968 by
which the government of Fidel Castro "intervened" – that is to say,
confiscated – all the small enterprises and family businesses, all the
way down to the shoe shine stands. This definitively deprived the
political Leadership of the country of the support of that not
insignificant sector of the population; but this is a matter that is
more complex and merits its own post.
Precisely because of the traumatic nature of the history that occurred,
I have always been grabbed by incredulity when I hear a Cuban of today
expressing that he has no political opinions, as if this was possible in
a society as polarized as ours, where there is practically nobody that
doesn't have a relative, a friend, or an acquaintance, that lost their
small business, launched himself to the sea looking to escape, or
suffered somehow from the lack of civil guarantees. I am of the opinion
that the same gregarious and thinking nature of man, imposes on him
having a perspective on our social issues, all according to his
intellect, his cultural baggage and the degree of information he
possesses. That this individual does not dare assume an active militancy
or frontal critique, that is a matter for a different discussion, but it
is almost always subject to its own judgement.
There will always be the estranged, those who sway to the flux of
circumstances like kelp in the bottom of the ocean. In this bundle
belong both the fanaticism of the communist militant, who refuses to
accept evidence in front of his nose, as well as the "high religiosity"
of the believer, that prevents him from involving himself in any matter
related to "worldly things" since it contaminates his pure hands. To
this we have to add those opportunists who know that by opening their
mouths they would lose their slice of the pie, or those who simply see
with indifference how this country declines, without moving a muscle
unless it is to protect their pocketbooks or to look at the shine of
their acrylics. All of them, nonetheless, protest in the intimacy of
their kitchens, before the empty pots, or before the thousand faces that
reflect misery, but are incapable of expressing themselves publicly,
either from indolence or pure cowardice.
At this point, we enter the topic of this dual morality that sinks more
than one Cuban up to his neck in manure. In this manner, those who
question a physician for talking with sincerity about his honestly
earned salary, can be the same ones who embezzle the finances of a state
enterprise, or mishandle the people's resources by appropriating
merchandise from a store. In fact, a considerable part of
administrators, at all levels of organization, are active Communist
militants, and for this, everywhere that a corruption scandal erupts,
there is always a "combative" nucleus of the Party and a Union that
never saw the corrupts coming, but – such a paradox! – are scandalized
if 300 workers sign a document and deliver it to their Ministry. But all
those who embezzle, steal or mishandle, can be seen later waving flags
and voicing slogans in the parades around the Plaza.
Thus, between the utopia of dreams and the disenchantment of reality,
between the to be and the not to be, we see how the promise of the "New
Man" dissipates. Maybe it is because this man – not Cuban, not
Anglo-Saxon, not Communist or Christian, but a man sui generis – is
still not ready to be emancipated from his egotism, to extend his hand
in exchange for nothing except the joy of serving. Some day this
spiritual hatching will come and this excellent creature, child of man
and God, will be reborn, but in the meantime, we have to remember, with
each step, the solemn declaration of our Martí, farsighted and sublime,
when he said "… a nation is made from men as they are, not as they
should be".
Translated by: lapizcero
October 4 2011
No comments:
Post a Comment