Friday, September 16, 2016

Fidel Castro’s Battle of Ideas… Political Pantomime

Fidel Castro's Battle of Ideas… Political Pantomime / Somos+, Roberto Camba

How much truth can a man take?
Friedrich Nietzsche

Somos+, Roberto Camba, 12 September 2016 — They say it began with the
fight to return the young rescued rafter Elian Gonzalez from the United
States to Cuba. Really it was much earlier, since the strategy never
changes: silence and ignore the adversary, incessantly repeat lies until
it is almost impossible to distinguish the truth.

To define, to communicate that the assault on the Moncada Barracks was a
revolt of sergeants, to publish in Bohemia magazine in January of 1959
that the Revolution was green like the palm trees and had nothing to do
with the Soviet Union, or to when the United States invaded Granada in
1983, are examples. And yet, "Revolution… is never lying," say the
propaganda billboards.

By monopolizing all the media immediately after 1959 and creating their
own education program, the arsenals of weapons were entirely under their
power. The enemy could have ideas, but could never express them publicly.

With the Elian Gonzalez case they started the Open Forums and the
Roundtable TV shows… all caps. I never understood that these
manifestations of the Battle of Ideas transmitted to the Cuban people
were just about ensuring their overwhelming support for the Revolution.
Where was the battle? Who was the enemy? Why do you line up the "canons"
facing your own soldiers?

The speakers at these "Masses" didn't have to think, they just recited
the Revolutionary "creed" from memory. On the Roundtable show the
soldiers didn't have to face the enemy, only their colleagues on the
other side of the table.

The concept of "Round" itself symbolizes the endless and monotonous.
Like in Mark Twain's novel "A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's
Court," the topics of each day of the week were identical: "The King
walks through his circular courtyard." There is nothing new in a vicious

All Communist regimes have curtailed freedom of expression. The only
explanation for this is that it is in the ideological arena where they
are most vulnerable. Therefore, they continually reject dialogue with
the opposition, they refuse to share "the same room" with its
representatives during the Americas Summit in Panama, so they hid the
people of the "Varela Project" and discussions with Edmundo Garcia were
only broadcast in Miami. Ultimately, former vicepresident Ricardo
Alarcon ends up looking ridiculous talking to Eliecer Avila, then a
student, as do the Castros at press conferences. They find having
interlocutors uncomfortable. They learned monologues, not dialogues.

They arm the "fighters" of the Rapid Response Brigades for an act of
repudiation against the Ladies in White. They shout a lot so they don't
have to hear the voices of these brave women. If there are not enough
people they bring an orchestra, they set up a "Street Fair" with
screaming kids or hold a "Carnival." If the Ladies in White continue to
express their ideas they force them into a bus and take them away.

The "Battle of Ideas" is a paradox. There is no "battle." They only
fight when they have previously "killed" the enemy. The other army is
not allowed to shoot. Only then they can win the battle. In the Cuban
Constitution there is only freedom of speech and of the press as long as
they "conform to the aims of socialist society" (Article 53), which is
another way of creating the crime of "enemy propaganda" (Article 103
Penal Code).

The "Battle …" has now moved to the digital arena. The "soldiers" of the
University of Computer Sciences and State Security must comment on the
articles of the official media, and of those refugee challengers in the
only place that the state can not fully control: the internet.

Compare the comments on the articles in the official sites such as
"Granma" or "Cubadebate" with those of the independent sites such as
"14ymedio" or "CubaNet." In the articles themselves, it seems they are
speaking of different countries. Censorship makes the difference. The
"soldiers" don't get medals, they get toiletries and free internet
access. In the land of those with nothing, nothing is an incentive.

The idea is not even new. Putin learned it in the KGB and used it
extensively as revealed by the newspaper The Guardian. The difference is
that Putin pays his trolls better. Like any war strategy, it has a weak
point. The "soldiers" — allowed to surf the internet to promote the
Revolution — are exposed to the enemy's "weapons." Eventually they will
contrast these ideas with those they've been inculcated with and with
the reality they experience. And they will learn the truth … and the
truth will set them free.

Source: Fidel Castro's Battle of Ideas… Political Pantomime / Somos+,
Roberto Camba – Translating Cuba -
Post a Comment