What happened to Cuba's Oswaldo Payá?
July 27, 2012
By: Achy Obejas
Did Oswaldo Payá die in a straightforward auto accident, or was he 
killed by Cuban government forces?
According to official reports, Payá and another Cuban died when the 
driver of the rented car he was in lost control and violently crashed 
against a tree in the far Eastern side of the country, where roads are 
particularly bad.
But speculation swirls around the incident. Was the car run off the road 
by another vehicle? Payá’s daughter, Rosa María, says that’s the case, 
that maybe it was only meant to be a warning but that her father ended 
up dead as a result. This would be the second auto accident Payá had in 
less than a month, and in the first he was run off a Havana street by 
another car.
With dissidents dropping like flies in the last few years, every move 
stirs suspicion and doubt.
In most other countries perhaps, this tragedy would be treated as a 
simple automobile fatality. But in Cuba, which has seen dissidents 
dropping like flies in the last few years, and where authorities operate 
in secret, defensively, and without explanation, every move stirs 
suspicion and doubt.
I confess that when I came upon the news, my guts twisted. Without 
reading much more than a headline, I immediately wondered about the 
circumstances of Payá’s death. (The late Laura Pollan, leader of the 
Ladies in White, had also worried about being run off the road by 
unidentified government agents.)
It’s not that Cuba puts its dissidents up against the wall and shoots 
them (although 40 years ago, it did just that). And under Raúl Castro, 
the long prison sentences that were the staple of Fidel Castro’s rule 
have become rarer.
But this is not because Raúl is more tolerant. His tactics regarding 
dissidents are simply different: Rather than virtually disappearing them 
into the black hole of prison, Raúl bullies and harasses them in plain 
sight, often violently, giving street toughs carte blanche to do as they 
will.
Consider this video of “acts of repudiation” against the Ladies in 
White, the female relatives of political prisoners swept up in the 2003 
Black Spring. The “acts,” which the government doesn’t officially admit 
to encouraging but for which every Cuban has been recruited at some time 
in their lives, involve the crudest and most vulgar epithets, pushing, 
shoving, and, sometimes, punching. When the cops finally show up, they 
arrest the Ladies in White. And say what you will about them — even if 
you believe they’re funded by nefarious U.S. based forces — the Ladies 
in White are absolutely non-violent. So why the use of such force?
And how, exactly, does a scene like this, taken with a cellphone, unfold 
in a Havana suburb, with both sides approaching each other as if in a 
duel? The result? A street fight: primitive, mindless. Where was the 
police? Nowhere, which given their ubiquity in Havana, is a real question.
Or consider this one, also from a cell, in which a dissident is 
confronted by an organized crowd outside his home. They chant slogans 
endlessly while Félix Navarro tries to talk to them, his voice even, his 
hands always where they can see them. The cops show up for this — but 
not to disperse the crowd or negotiate a public peace. Instead, they 
arrest Navarro and take him away.
The charges? None, as was the case with the 50 or so mourners who 
attended Payá’s funeral and found themselves detained without charges 
for about a day. Among those held overnight was Guillermo Fariñas, a 
dissident whose 2010 hunger strike forced the government into 
negotiations with both the Catholic Church and the Spanish government 
and into releasing the prisoners from the Black Spring. Fariñas, like 
Payá, is a recipient of the European Union’s Andrei Sakharov Prize for 
Human Rights.
So what happened to Payá? Cuban authorities have so far not allowed 
either survivor of the fatal crash — both Europeans — to comment 
publicly but Spanish newspapers say Ángel Carromero, the Spaniard at the 
wheel, claims in the police report that he failed to see a traffic sign 
to reduce speed and lost control. (Different reports have noted that the 
foreigners, in the front seat, wore seat belts, and the Cubans, in the 
back, did not — which strikes me as probable.)
Ofelia Acevedo, Payá’s wife, says she knows of text messages sent by 
Carromero and another passenger, a Swede who, like Carromero, had come 
to Cuba on a tourist visa but was doing political work, in which they 
said they were being repeatedly hit by another car. (Both foreigners, 
who remain in Cuba, are also affiliated with conservative political 
parties in their home countries.)
Why does any of this matter? Besides the fact that two men died in that 
mystery crash, one of them happened to be one of Cuba’s best known 
dissidents, but also one of its most curious.
Even tempered, measured in his statements, and a man who kept his 
government job long after he could have given it up to live off 
remittances from abroad, Payá founded the Christian Liberation Movement, 
a party that remains illegal in Cuba. (All but the Cuban Communist Party 
are illegal on the island.) Committed to non-violence and a lifelong 
practicing Catholic, Payá — who was also a lifelong anti-communist — was 
best known for two projects that, at their core, ironically recognized 
the fundamental legitimacy of the revolutionary government.
The Varela Project used the Cuban constitution revised in the '70s and 
'90s as its basis and depended on a clause that supposedly allows Cuban 
citizens to petition for change. Payá accomplished an incredible feat of 
getting 14,000 signatures to present to the Cuban parliament, demanding 
that it recognize rights enumerated in the constitution, such as freedom 
of speech and assembly, that have been historically ignored. Former U.S. 
President Jimmy Carter endorsed his efforts, as did former 
Czechoslovakian President Vaclav Havel. The Cuban congress responded by 
endorsing a separate referendum which made the island’s socialist system 
“irrevocable.”
Payá’s second petition drive, the Heredia Project, demanded that the 
government — which currently charges an arm and a leg for a passport and 
other travel documents (and in Cuba, Cubans always need other travel 
documents) -- allow Cubans to come and go, to housing rights, to 
equality before the law, and to citizenship regardless of their place of 
residence, as the constitution guarantees.
What set Payá apart was less the projects themselves — which were brainy 
but futile —  than that, while he understood that the government had all 
the power, he never, ever called for Cuba’s problems to be solved by 
anyone but Cubans. And by Cubans, he meant those on the island. It gave 
him an incredible moral force.
What happened to Payá? We may never really know.
http://www.wbez.org/blogs/achy-obejas/2012-07/what-happened-cubas-oswaldo-pay%C3%A1-101228
No comments:
Post a Comment