Published: Saturday, December 31, 2011, 12:08 PM
The Jersey Journal By The Jersey Journal
By ROLAND A. ALUM / SPECIAL TO THE JERSEY JOURNAL
The Fidel-&-Raul Castro regime marks 53 years this Jan. 1. The brothers 
unquestionably enjoyed extraordinary popularity in 1959, but the 
enthusiasm soon vanished as they turned Cuba into a financially and 
spiritually bankrupt Marxist anti-utopia.
As a result, nearly two million Cubans of all social backgrounds have 
fled, many of them settling in Hudson County.
By the 1950s, Cuba was a regional leader in numerous social indicators, 
notwithstanding instability and corruption during the republican era 
(1902-1958). But since 1959 the island-nation has become a backward, 
closed society beleaguered by unproductivity and rationing.
Sociologist Tomas Masaryk noted that "dictators 'look good' until the 
last minutes"; in Cuba's case, it seems particularly fine to certain 
U.S. intellectuals. Comfortably from abroad, apologists contend that 
most of the socioeconomic problems that traditionally afflicted the 
prior five and a half decades were eliminated after 1959. Yet, 
fact-finding by international social-scientists challenges this fantasy.
An early, little-known account uncovering some effects of the Castros' 
regimentation came from research in Cuba in 1969-'70 by U.S. 
cultural-anthropologists Oscar Lewis and Douglas Butterworth. They 
intended to test Lewis' theory that a culture of poverty would not exist 
in a Marxist-oriented society. They had naively presupposed that the 
socially alienating conditions that engender such phenomena could 
develop among the poor solely under capitalism.
The Lewis-Butterworth early on-the-ground scrutiny validates many 
accounts by respected experts and the much vilified exiles. There exists 
a culture of poverty in Cuba, although it is not necessarily a survivor 
of the old times, but seemingly a by-product of the Castros' 
totalitarian socialism. There were always poor Cubans, and some version 
of the culture of poverty might have existed before; but in my 
communications with Butterworth, he reconfirmed another discovery. The 
researchers could not document a case for a pervasive pre-1959 culture 
of poverty. The authorities must have suspected the prospective 
conclusions because the scholars were abruptly expelled and their Cuban 
statistician imprisoned.
Upon the 53rd anniversary, the old Lewis-Butterworth analysis invites 
renewed reflection. Apologists customarily replicate propagandistic 
cliches by blaming failures on external factors, such as the ending, two 
decades ago, of the multibillion-dollar subsidies from the defunct 
Soviet Bloc.
The anthropologists' undertaking, however, revealed that life for 
average Cubans in the Castros' first decade was already beset with 
corruption and time-wasting food lines. Likewise, Butterworth described 
how ordinary people were engaging in what socio-behavioral scientists 
now call "everyday forms of resistance." Cubans were already undermining 
the police-state through black-marketeering, pilfering and vandalism, as 
we hear that they continue to do decades later.
After more than half a century of oppression and poor quality of life, 
one hopes for a transition to an open society with equal opportunities 
for every Cuban.
EDITOR'S NOTE: The author, a long-time Hudsonite, is a 
political-anthropologist affiliated with Icod Associates of New Jersey. 
Email him at rolandnj@yahoo.com.
http://www.nj.com/hudson/voices/index.ssf/2011/12/cubas_culture_of_poverty_persi.html
No comments:
Post a Comment