Cuba to $45.7 million
By William E. Gibson
Washington Bureau Chief
Posted June 23 2007
WASHINGTON -- House approval this week of a huge increase in funding for
a controversial program to promote democracy in Cuba delivered a
legislative victory for anti-Castro advocates from South Florida. But
critics warn the money could be squandered on attempts to influence
public opinion rather than used to help dissidents.
The House action, on a vote of 254 to 170, was the first test of
strength on Cuba policy under the Democratic-run Congress, and the first
round went to embargo hardliners.
After an intense debate, the House voted to increase the democracy
program's funding five-fold to $45.7 million next fiscal year, which
starts in October. The vote on an amendment to a spending bill
strengthened the hand of President Bush and South Florida members of
Congress who hope to build public and international pressure against the
Cuban government while encouraging dissent within Cuba.
"We've shown our votes here will go up, not down," boasted Rep. Lincoln
Diaz-Balart, R-Miami, a sponsor of the amendment and congressional
leader for the democracy program and for the U.S. embargo of Cuba. "We
got 66 Democrats in addition to all but six Republicans. It shows that
the efforts of others [to ease the embargo] will be no cakewalk."
Undaunted, some leaders in the House and Senate plan to push legislation
that would ease restrictions on trade and travel to the island while
scrutinizing spending on the pro-democracy program, much of which is
filtered through South Florida groups.
House Ways and Means Chairman Charles Rangel, D- NY, and Senate Finance
Committee Chairman Max Baucus unveiled legislation that would allow
Americans to travel to Cuba and also eliminate requirements that farmers
get paid in cash before shipping food to the island.
"This is an important first step toward modernizing our Cuba policy,"
said Baucus, D-Mont., regarding his legislation.
The Cuba democracy program and the embargo issues are separate, though
related. Most of those who favor the embargo staunchly back the
democracy program. Many of those who oppose the travel ban and embargo
also question the effectiveness of the democracy program and how its
money is spent.
After reviewing grants distributed by the State Department and the U.S.
Agency for International Development from 1996 to 2005, the U.S.
Government Accountability Office last year cited lax controls and poor
oversight of some of the $73 million provided to U.S. organizations to
support Cuban dissidents. Some funding went for coloring books and
literature, Godiva chocolates, cashmere sweaters and Nintendo Game Boys.
Defenders of the program said the vast bulk of the money has been
properly spent.
"The program now is being improved," Diaz-Balart said. "And now it is
ready to take on the added responsibility of the additional funding."
Morgan Ortagus, a spokeswoman for USAID, said on Friday the agency could
not comment on pending legislation or specify how additional funds would
be spent.
Critics say the program reaches few dissidents on the island and spends
too much to try to influence opinion outside of Cuba.
"It's important to note that a lot of the money is not destined for
Cuba. A lot has to do with projects outside Cuba," said Philip Peters,
vice president of the Lexington Institute, a research group based in
northern Virginia, who has organized congressional visits to the island.
"It funds research programs at U.S. universities. It funds organizations
that try to change public opinion in Europe.
"If this appropriation sticks, it's going to be a five-fold increase in
spending. Lord knows what they will do with that much money."
The Senate must still consider its own appropriations bill. The House
vote, backed by the White House, will strengthen the program's chances
of getting increased funding.
"No one wants to go on record opposing democracy in Cuba, which is how
your opponent in the next election could portray your vote on this
issue," said William LeoGrande, an expert on Cuba at American University
in Washington. "But I wouldn't be surprised to see Congress come back in
a year to see whether appropriate safeguards have been put in place."
William E. Gibson can be reached at wgibson@sun-sentinel.com or
202-824-8256.
No comments:
Post a Comment